Cloud bills creep upward through oversized instances, forgotten resources, and on-demand pricing for steady workloads. The fix is rarely a single switch; it is disciplined analysis followed by ongoing governance. We audit your spend, capture the quick wins, then put a lightweight FinOps practice in place so costs stay accountable rather than drifting back up after the first clean-up.
Spend audit and waste identification
We start with a detailed analysis of your billing data, broken down by service, team, and environment, to see where money actually goes. The audit surfaces idle and orphaned resources, unattached storage volumes, oversized instances running at low utilisation, and old snapshots quietly accumulating charges. Untagged resources are flagged because you cannot govern what you cannot attribute. The output is a prioritised list of savings ranked by effort and impact, so you can act on the easy, high-value items immediately and plan the rest.
Rightsizing and architectural savings
Many savings come from matching resources to real demand. We rightsize compute based on observed utilisation, move suitable workloads to cheaper instance families or to serverless where it fits, and apply storage lifecycle policies that tier or expire data automatically. Auto-scaling and scheduled shutdowns stop non-production environments billing around the clock. Where architecture allows, we replace self-managed components with managed services that cost less to operate. These changes reduce the bill without compromising performance, because they remove waste rather than capacity you need.
Commitment-based discounts
For workloads with predictable baseline usage, on-demand pricing is the most expensive option. We analyse usage patterns and recommend the right mix of Reserved Instances, Savings Plans, or committed-use discounts, balancing commitment term against flexibility so you are not locked into capacity you might outgrow. We model the break-even and projected savings before you commit, and stage purchases as confidence in the baseline grows. This converts steady, unavoidable spend into substantially lower rates without betting on usage you cannot predict.
FinOps governance and accountability
One-off clean-ups erode unless cost becomes a shared habit. We establish a consistent tagging strategy so spend maps to teams and projects, set budgets with alerts that fire before overruns, and provide dashboards that make cost visible to engineers, not just finance. Lightweight review cadences keep optimisation continuous rather than reactive. The aim is a FinOps culture proportionate to your size, where teams see the cost of their choices and waste is caught early instead of discovered in next quarter's invoice.
What You Get
Detailed spend audit with prioritised savings
Rightsizing recommendations and implementation
Reserved Instance or Savings Plan strategy
Idle resource cleanup and lifecycle policies
Tagging strategy with cost allocation reporting
Budgets, alerts, and FinOps dashboards
Why Teams Choose TurnGlobal
Savings ranked by effort so quick wins come first
Rightsizing cuts waste, not capacity you rely on
Commitment modelled before you lock in any spend
FinOps governance keeps costs down long term
FAQs
How much can we realistically save?
It varies with how the environment was built, but unoptimised estates commonly hold meaningful waste in idle resources and on-demand pricing. We quantify the achievable saving in the audit before any commitment, so the figure is grounded in your actual usage rather than a generic promise.
Will cost cutting hurt performance or reliability?
No, when done properly. We remove waste, oversized instances, idle resources, and on-demand pricing for steady workloads, not the capacity your applications actually need. Rightsizing is based on observed utilisation, and we validate performance after each change to ensure headroom is preserved.
Do Reserved Instances lock us in for too long?
Only if bought blindly. We match commitment terms to confidence in your baseline, often favouring flexible Savings Plans, and stage purchases over time. We model break-even first, so you commit only to usage that is genuinely steady and predictable.